Risk factors for interstitial lung disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) can potentially result in interstitial lung disease (ILD), which can substantially impact a patient's quality of life, subsequently leading to the interruption or discontinuation of EGRF-TKI treatment. Clinicians, therefore, need to thoroughly assess patients to determine if they are at risk for ILD. METHODS: We searched for observational study in the following databases: MEDLINE via the PubMed, CENTRAL, and IchushiWeb. The primary outcome was risk factors for the development of ILD, while the secondary outcome was risk factors for the severity of ILD. Of the 1602 studies returned, we selected 11 for meta-analysis, performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Risk factors for developing ILD were sex (odds ratio (OR), 1.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-3.22; I2 = 0%; P = 0.02), smoking history (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.51-3.00; I2 = 3 4%; P = 0.0001), and history of ILD (OR = 5.95; 95% CI, 3.34-10.59; I2 = 67%; P = 0.0009). Age, previous thoracic surgery or radiotherapy, performance status, histological type of lung cancer, and treatment line were not statistically significant risk factors for ILD. Risk factors identified in one study were serum albumin level, history of nivolumab use, radiographic residual lung volume, and history of pulmonary infection. CONCLUSIONS: We identified risk factors for developing ILD in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-TKIs.

Involvement of Muscarinic M3 Receptor in the Development of M2 Macrophages in Allergic Inflammation.

INTRODUCTION: The muscarinic M3 receptor antagonist, tiotropium, has a bronchodilatory effect on asthma patients. Additionally, tiotropium inhibits allergic airway inflammation and remodeling in a murine asthma model. However, the underlying mechanisms of this M3 receptor antagonist remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the effect of muscarinic M3 receptor blockage on M2 macrophage development during allergic airway inflammation. METHODS: BALB/c mice were sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin to develop a murine model of allergic airway inflammation mimicking human atopic asthma. During the challenge phase, mice were treated with or without tiotropium. Lung cells were isolated 24 h after the last treatment and gated using CD68-positive cells. Relm-α and Arginase-1 (Arg1) (M2 macrophage markers) expression was determined by flow cytometry. Mouse bone marrow mononuclear cell-derived macrophages (mBMMacs) and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)-derived macrophages were stimulated with IL-4 and treated with a muscarinic M3 receptor antagonist in vitro. RESULTS: The total cells, eosinophils, and IL-5 and IL-13 levels in BAL fluids were markedly decreased in the asthma group treated with tiotropium compared to that in the untreated asthma group. The Relm-α and Arg1 expression in macrophages was reduced considerably in the asthma group treated with tiotropium compared to that in the untreated asthma group, suggesting that the development of M2 macrophages was inhibited by muscarinic M3 receptor blockage. Additionally, muscarinic M3 receptor blockage in vitro significantly inhibited M2 macrophage development in both mBMMacs- and PBMCs-derived macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: Muscarinic M3 receptor blockage inhibits M2 macrophage development and prevents allergic airway inflammation. Moreover, muscarinic M3 receptors might be involved in the differentiation of immature macrophages into M2 macrophages.

Prevalence and causes of chronic cough in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cough is one of the most common symptoms of respiratory diseases and can adversely affect patients' quality of life and interfere with social activities, resulting in a significant social burden. A survey is required to elucidate the frequency and treatment effect of chronic cough. However, clinical studies that cover all of Japan have not yet been conducted. METHODS: Patients who presented with a cough that lasted longer than 8 weeks and visited the respiratory clinics or hospitals affiliated with the Japan Cough Society during the 2-year study period were registered. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients were enrolled, and those who did not meet the definition of chronic cough were excluded. A total of 334 patients were analyzed: 201 patients had a single cause, and 113 patients had two or more causes. The main causative diseases were cough variant asthma in 92 patients, sinobronchial syndrome (SBS) in 36 patients, atopic cough in 31 patients, and gastroesophageal reflux (GER)-associated cough in 10 patients. The time required to treat undiagnosed patients and those with SBS was significantly longer and the treatment success rate for GER-associated cough was considerably poor. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that the main causes of chronic cough were cough variant asthma, SBS, atopic cough, and their complications. We also showed that complicated GER-associated cough was more likely to become refractory. This is the first nationwide study in Japan of the causes and treatment effects of chronic cough.

Baseline Characteristics and ICS/LAMA/LABA Response in Asthma: Analyses From the CAPTAIN Study.

BACKGROUND: Findings from CAPTAIN (NCT02924688) suggest that treatment response to fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) differs according to baseline type 2 inflammation markers in patients with moderate to severe asthma. Understanding how other patient physiologic and clinical characteristics affect response to inhaled therapies may guide physicians toward a personalized approach for asthma management. OBJECTIVE: To investigate, using CAPTAIN data, the predictive value of key demographic and baseline physiologic variables in patients with asthma (lung function, bronchodilator reversibility, age, age at asthma onset) on response to addition of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist UMEC to inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist combination FF/VI, or doubling the FF dose. METHODS: Prespecified and post hoc analyses of CAPTAIN data were performed using categorical and continuous variables of key baseline characteristics to understand their influence on treatment outcomes (lung function [trough FEV1], annualized rate of moderate/severe exacerbations, and asthma control [Asthma Control Questionnaire]) following addition of UMEC to FF/VI or doubling the FF dose in FF/VI or FF/UMEC/VI. RESULTS: Adding UMEC to FF/VI led to greater improvements in trough FEV1 versus doubling the FF dose across all baseline characteristics assessed. Doubling the FF dose was generally associated with numerically greater reductions in the annualized rate of moderate/severe exacerbations compared with adding UMEC, independent of baseline characteristics. Adding UMEC and/or doubling the FF dose generally led to improvements in Asthma Control Questionnaire scores irrespective of baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous findings with type 2 biomarkers, lung function, bronchodilator reversibility, age and age at asthma onset do not appear to predict response to inhaled therapy.

Portal Vein Thrombosis With Hypoplasia in the Left Lobe of the Liver: A Case Report.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an acute-onset, emergent thrombotic disease that is difficult to diagnose without an apparent underlying disease unless the clinician actively suspects its presence. We present a case of acute PVT with underlying left lobe hypoplasia of the liver, a previously undescribed condition. A 79-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with the chief complaint of anorexia. His medical history included hypertension and an old brain infarction. The patient had no history of surgery. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed the disappearance of the left lobe of the liver and defects in the contrast effect in the left portal vein. The diagnosis reached was PVT with left lobe hypoplasia of the liver. Hypoplasia of the liver manifests few symptoms and may be identified incidentally. Clinicians need to be aware that PVT can develop from various underlying conditions, including hypoplasia of the liver, and we recommend aggressive imaging studies to help detect the presence of PVT when encountering similar cases.

Predictors of improvement of radial-endobronchial ultrasonography findings from "adjacent to" to "within" in endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: In flexible bronchoscopy, endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) has varying diagnostic yield depending on the findings of radial-endobronchial ultrasonography (R-EBUS). The diagnosis rate is lower when the ultrasound probe is "adjacent to", than when it is "within" the lesion. However, these findings are inconsistent, and the imaging status may change from "adjacent to" to "within" as examination progresses. In this study, we analyzed the predictive factors for this change, which remain unexplored till date. Methods: Patients who underwent flexible bronchoscopic biopsy with EBUS-GS at Kameda Medical Centre between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients without "adjacent to" lesions were excluded. The appearance of "A to W" (the change from "adjacent to" to "within" imaging status) was the primary outcome. Based on multivariate regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we evaluated the discriminative properties of the factors strongly correlated with "A to W". Results: In total, 260 patients were included in this study. In 84 cases, the R-EBUS findings were "A to W". No such findings were observed in 176 cases. The mean lesion diameter was significantly larger (P=0.021) in the group with "A to W" than in the group without. The odds ratio [1.023 (1.003-1.046)] for lesion diameter showed statistical significance in the multivariable regression model. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.346 and 0.852, respectively, at the optimal threshold (29.25 mm) set using the Youden index. Conclusions: We found that lesion diameter was a significant factor in predicting "A to W", with a cut-off value of 29.25 mm and high specificity (0.852).

Efficacy and safety of macrolide therapy for adult asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The evidence for macrolide therapy in adult asthma is not properly established and remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of macrolide therapy for adult asthma. METHODS: We searched randomized controlled trials from MEDLINE via the PubMed, CENTRAL, and Ichushi Web databases. The primary outcome was asthma exacerbation. The secondary outcomes were serious adverse events (including mortality), asthma-related quality of life (symptom scales, Asthma Control Questionnaire, and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire), rescue medication (puffs/day), respiratory function (morning peak expiratory flow, evening peak flow, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s), bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and minimum oral corticosteroid dose. Of the 805 studies, we selected seven studies for the meta-analysis, which was conducted using a random-effects model. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000050824). RESULTS: No significant difference between macrolide and placebo for asthma exacerbations was observed (risk ratio 0.71, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.46-1.09; p = 0.12). Macrolide therapy for adult asthma showed a significant improvement in rescue medication with short-acting beta-agonists (mean difference -0.41, 95 % CI -0.78 to -0.04; p = 0.03). Macrolide therapy did not show more serious adverse events (odd ratio 0.61, 95 % CI 0.34-1.10; p = 0.10) than those with placebo. The other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the macrolide and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Macrolide therapy for adult asthma may be more effective than placebo and could be a treatment option.

Impact of dupilumab across seasons in patients with type 2, uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal variability could influence asthma exacerbations. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. In the 52-week QUEST study (NCT02414854), add-on dupilumab every 2 weeks vs placebo significantly reduced exacerbations and improved prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma. TRAVERSE (NCT02134028), the open-label QUEST extension study, enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe asthma to investigate long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab, including patients who previously received placebo that initiated dupilumab therapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate long-term dupilumab efficacy in reducing exacerbations across yearly seasons in patients with type 2 inflammatory asthma with and without clinical evidence of allergic asthma. METHODS: Unadjusted annualized exacerbation rate and proportions of patients experiencing severe asthma exacerbations are reported by month and season and for both hemispheres. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with type 2 asthma experiencing 1 or more severe asthma exacerbations during QUEST was 20.8% vs 10.0% in spring, 18.2% vs 7.3% in summer, 22.2% vs 12.6% in autumn, and 26.4% vs 12.0% in winter, for placebo- vs dupilumab-treated patients, respectively; P was less than .001 for placebo vs dupilumab in all seasons. Reductions in the proportion of patients experiencing severe exacerbations across seasons in subgroups with and without evidence of allergic asthma were similar to the overall type 2 population. Reductions in severe exacerbations observed during QUEST were sustained during TRAVERSE, up to 96 weeks across both hemispheres. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab reduced asthma exacerbations, with no difference in the reduction between seasons, in patients with type 2 inflammation, with and without evidence of allergic asthma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02414854, NCT02134028.

Prevalence and Impact of Social Frailty in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are more inclined to have a high level of social vulnerability due to their physical and psychological burden. However, to date, there have been no study on social frailty in patients with COPD. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, characteristics, and impact of social frailty in patients with COPD. Methods: Social frailty was assessed using five items in a questionnaire. A patient was diagnosed with social frailty if responses to two or more items were positive. Four hundred and five patients with COPD were assessed for social frailty, dyspnea, and appetite. We also prospectively examined the number of acute exacerbation and unexpected hospitalization for 1 year. Results: Thirty-six percent of patients with COPD had social frailty. They had reduced appetite and more severe dyspnea [Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire score: odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69‒0.95, p < 0.01; modified Medical Research Council score: OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.05‒1.93, P = 0.02] than patients without social frailty. Social frailty was not a risk factor for moderate acute exacerbation of COPD but a risk factor for severe acute exacerbation and all-cause unexpected hospitalization (severe acute exacerbation: ß, standardized regression coefficient: 0.13, 95% CI 0.01‒0.25, P = 0.04, unexpected hospitalization: ß 0.17, 95% CI 0.05‒0.29, P = 0.01). Conclusion: The prevalence of social frailty is 36%; however, social frailty has a marked clinical impact in patients with COPD.

Clinical inertia in asthma.

Despite advances in pharmaceutical treatment in recent years, a relatively high proportion of patients with asthma do not have adequate asthma control, causing chronic disability, poor quality of life, and multiple emergency department visits and hospitalizations. A multifaceted approach is needed to overcome the problems with managing asthma, and clinical inertia (CI) is a crucial concept to assist with this approach. It divides clinical inertia into three main categories, which include healthcare provider-related, patient-related, and healthcare system-related CI. The strategies to overcome these CI are complex, and the M-GAP approach, which combines a multidisciplinary approach, dissemination of guidelines, utilization of applications, and development and promotion of low-cost prescriptions, will help clinicians.

Efficacy of Additional Corticosteroids After Dexamethasone Treatment for Moderate to Severe COVID-19: An Observational Study.

Background Previous studies have demonstrated dexamethasone (DEX)'s efficacy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In contrast, patients with residual lung field shading and symptoms after DEX treatment have been observed, and the efficacy of additional corticosteroids (AC) is unknown. Objectives We aimed to investigate the efficacy of AC in patients with COVID-19 with residual respiratory symptoms or who required oxygen therapy or invasive mechanical ventilation after DEX treatment. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective observational study including 261 patients with community-onset COVID-19, aged ≥ 18 years, admitted to our hospital between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021. Finally, 34 patients were included in the study who met all four of the following criteria: (1) required oxygen therapy or invasive ventilation, (2) were treated with DEX, (3) had residual shading on chest imaging after DEX treatment, or (4) had unimproved respiratory symptoms or oxygen saturation < 90%. We reviewed the medical records and clinical courses of 14 patients who received AC therapy (AC group) and 20 patients who did not (non-additional corticosteroids or NC group). Results The 90-day mortality rate was 35.7% in the AC group and 25.0% in the NC group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.797). In addition, there was no difference between groups in the proportion of patients who required oxygen therapy at discharge (64% vs. 35%, p = 0.162). The time from the end of DEX therapy to discharge was significantly longer in the AC group (median 7.5 vs. 33 days, p = 0.019). Regarding serious adverse events, infection was statistically more common in the AC group than in the NC group (p = 0.005). Conclusions AC after DEX treatment does not improve clinical outcomes and may prolong hospital stay.

Clinical Utility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Titer Multiplied by Binding Avidity of Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) in Monitoring Protective Immunity and Clinical Severity.

Conventional serum antibody titer, which expresses antibody level, does not provide antigen binding avidity of the variable region of the antibody, which is essential for the defense response to infection. Here, we quantified anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody binding avidity to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) by competitive binding-inhibition activity (IC50) between SARS-CoV-2 S1 antigen immobilized on the DCP microarray and various RBD doses added to serum and expressed as 1/IC50 nM. The binding avidity analyzed under equilibrium conditions of antigen-antibody binding reaction is different from the avidity index measured with the chaotropic agent, such as urea, under nonequilibrium and short-time conditions. Quantitative determination of the infection-protection potential of antibodies was assessed by ABAT (antigen binding avidity antibody titer), which was calculated by the quantity (level) × quality (binding avidity) of antibodies. The binding avidity correlated strongly (r = 0.811) with cell-based virus-neutralizing activity. Maturation of the protective antibody induced by repeated vaccinations or SARS-CoV-2 infection was classified into three categories of ABAT, such as an initial, low, and high ABAT. Antibody maturity correlated with the clinical severity of COVID-19. Once a mature high binding avidity was achieved, it was maintained for at least 6-8 months regardless of the subsequent change in the antibody levels.

[SURVEY OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT ANAPHYLAXIS AND GUIDANCE WHEN DISPENSING EPIPEN FOR PHARMACISTS WORKING IN PHARMACIES].

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Anaphylactic shock is a serious and life-threatening condition, and affected patients should be quickly and effectively treated with an EpiPen. Although the correct use of an EpiPen is greatly affected by a user's proficiency level and the instructions accompanying the EpiPen, there has been almost no investigation into the knowledge of the EpiPen and the actual situation of the accompanying instructions for use. Therefore, we conducted this nationwide survey to elucidate these issues. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted among pharmacists registered as members of the system of a research company outside the university and working at pharmacies with experience in handling EpiPen prescriptions. RESULTS: Many of the pharmacists surveyed knew that the EpiPen is the first-line treatment for anaphylactic shock. However, they did not have sufficient knowledge of administration routes and candidates for second-line treatment. Both their occasions and experiences of dealing of EpiPen were found to be low. CONSIDERATION: It is desirable to learn at conferences regarding allergology/clinical allergy and seminars for medical professionals including pharmacists in order to acquire the skills and knowledge to consult with patients with allergic diseases, including action plans presented by doctors in preparation for recurrence of anaphylaxis.

COVID-19-Induced Eosinophilic Lower Airway Inflammation in Those With Multiple COVID-19 Vaccinations.

A 29-year-old woman was admitted with a diagnosis of ischemic enteritis. She had a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection four weeks before this visit and continued to experience a cough. Four months before, she received the third COVID-19 vaccine. Chest computer tomography revealed scattered ground-glass opacities in both upper lobes. Based on abnormalities in chest imaging, eosinophilia, and a high level of fractional exhaled nitric oxide, she was diagnosed with eosinophilic lower airway inflammation due to COVID-19. Since the visit, the patient had an intermittent fever and no radiological improvement, so systemic corticosteroid treatment was initiated, and the symptoms and clinical findings improved. Clinicians should know the potential association between COVID-19 and eosinophilic lower airway inflammation, which may still occur despite multiple vaccinations.

Clinic vs Home Spirometry for Monitoring Lung Function in Patients With Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Studies examining agreement between home and clinic spirometry in patients with asthma are limited, with conflicting results. Understanding the strengths and limitations of telehealth and home spirometry is particularly important considering the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. RESEARCH QUESTION: How well do home and clinic measurements of trough FEV1 agree in patients with uncontrolled asthma? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This post hoc analysis used trough FEV1 data from the randomized double-anonymized parallel-group phase 3A CAPTAIN (205715; NCT02924688) and phase 2B 205832 (NCT03012061) trials in patients with uncontrolled asthma. CAPTAIN evaluated the impact of adding umeclidinium to fluticasone furoate/vilanterol via a single inhaler; the 205832 trial investigated adding umeclidinium to fluticasone furoate vs placebo. Trough FEV1 measurements were collected via home spirometry and supervised in-person spirometry in the research clinic. To compare home and clinic spirometry, we examined the time-course analyses of home and clinic trough FEV1, and generated post hoc Bland-Altman plots to assess agreement between home and clinic spirometry. RESULTS: Data from 2,436 patients (CAPTAIN trial) and 421 patients (205832 trial) were analyzed. Treatment-related improvements in FEV1 were observed in both trials, using home and clinic spirometry. Improvements measured by home spirometry were of lower magnitude and less consistent than clinic measurements. Bland-Altman plots suggested poor agreement between home and clinic trough FEV1 at baseline and week 24. INTERPRETATION: This post hoc comparison of home and clinic spirometry is the largest conducted in asthma. Results showed that home spirometry was less consistent than and lacked agreement with clinic spirometry, suggesting that unsupervised home readings are not interchangeable with clinic measurements. However, these findings may only be applicable to home spirometry using the specific device and coaching methods employed in these studies. Postpandemic, further research to optimize home spirometry use is needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; Nos.: NCT03012061 and NCT02924688; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Eosinophils and tissue remodeling: Relevance to airway disease.

The ability of human tissue to reorganize and restore its existing structure underlies tissue homeostasis in the healthy airways, but in disease can persist without normal resolution, leading to an altered airway structure. Eosinophils play a cardinal role in airway remodeling both in health and disease, driving epithelial homeostasis and extracellular matrix turnover. Physiological consequences associated with eosinophil-driven remodeling include impaired lung function and reduced bronchodilator reversibility in asthma, and obstructed airflow in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Given the contribution of airway remodeling to the development and persistence of symptoms in airways disease, targeting remodeling is an important therapeutic consideration. Indeed, there is early evidence that eosinophil attenuation may reduce remodeling and disease progression in asthma. This review provides an overview of tissue remodeling in both health and airway disease with a particular focus on eosinophilic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, as well as the role of eosinophils in these processes and the implications for therapeutic interventions. Areas for future research are also noted, to help improve our understanding of the homeostatic and pathological roles of eosinophils in tissue remodeling, which should aid the development of targeted and effective treatments for eosinophilic diseases of the airways.

Comparative Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors for Treatment-Naïve ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastasis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases and acquired resistance complicate the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive (ALK-p) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, this review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of brain metastasis, acquired resistance, and prospects for overcoming these challenges. A network meta-analysis of relevant phase III randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the efficacies of multiple ALK inhibitors by drug and generation in overall patients with ALK-p untreated advanced NSCLC and a subgroup of patients with CNS metastases. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Generation-specific comparison results showed that third-generation ALK inhibitors were significantly more effective than second-generation ALK inhibitors in prolonging the PFS of the subgroup of patients with CNS metastases. Drug-specific comparison results demonstrated that lorlatinib was the most effective in prolonging PFS, followed by brigatinib, alectinib, ensartinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, and chemotherapy. While lorlatinib was superior to brigatinib for PFS in the overall patient population, no significant difference between the two was found in the subgroup of patients with CNS metastases. These results can serve as a foundation for basic, clinical, and translational research and guide clinical oncologists in developing individualized treatment strategies for patients with ALK-p, ALK inhibitor-naive advanced NSCLC.

Mometasone/Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium (MF/IND/GLY) and MF/IND at Different MF Strengths versus Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Xinafoate (FLU/SAL) and FLU/SAL+ Tiotropium in Patients with Asthma.

Background: Once-daily, single-inhaler mometasone furoate/indacaterol acetate/glycopyrronium bromide (MF/IND/GLY, an ICS/LABA/LAMA) and MF/IND (an ICS/LABA) via Breezhaler® have been approved for the maintenance treatment of patients with asthma inadequately controlled with medium-or high-dose ICS or medium-or high-dose ICS/LABA treatment. Objective: Once-daily (o.d.) formulations of MF/IND/GLY and MF/IND at different MF dose strengths have been compared with twice-daily (b.i.d.) fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate (FLU/SAL), and b.i.d. FLU/SAL+ o.d. tiotropium (TIO) in the PALLADIUM, IRIDIUM and ARGON studies. Methods: The similarity in study design and consistent outcomes in these studies prompted the pooling of data in this review to better characterise these novel once-daily controller formulations. Results: Pooled data from PALLADIUM and IRIDIUM studies showed comparable or greater efficacy with o.d. MF/IND formulations versus b.i.d. FLU/SAL. The o.d. MF/IND/GLY was superior to b.i.d. FLU/SAL in the IRIDIUM study, and similar to, if not more efficacious than b.i.d. FLU/SAL + o.d. TIO in the ARGON study. Conclusion: These formulations therefore provide novel once-daily treatment options for patients across asthma severity and flexibility for clinicians to step-up or step-down the treatment using the same device and formulations.